By Jim Mettenbrink

We continue considering the radical entrance into Jesus’ kingdom that He established after He left the earth. That in itself is radical – a nonvisible king in a visible kingdom. Actually, His kingdom is virtually invisible too, at least on earth – No palace or throne, no army or courts, no royal guard, and no administration. But the apostle Paul refers to Jesus’ kingdom as having subjects, i.e., earthbound citizens – God the Father “has delivered us from the power of darkness and conveyed us into the kingdom of the Son of His love” (Colossians 1:12-13). And he calls those subjects citizens (Ephesians 2:19; Philippians 3:20). That this kingdom is invisible is revealed that the citizenship is in heaven (Php 3:20) – no earthly royal records. And Jesus’ throne is in heaven (Acts 2:30-34; Revelation 4:1-5:14).

Continue reading→

By Jim Mettenbrink

We are considering the radical entrance into Jesus’ kingdom that He established after He left the earth. That in itself is radical – a non visible king in a visible kingdom. Regarding accepting Jesus as king, He said, “ …if you do not believe that I am He, you will die in your sins” (Jn 8:24). Implicitly if you do not believe He is the Savior-King, you would not be a citizen in his kingdom. Last week, we concluded proposing to determine what constitutes belief that God considers to be true belief, i.e., the saving faith. There is a huge difference in belief and faith. So what is genuine faith?

Continue reading→

By Jim Mettenbrink

While on trial before Governor Pilate, Jesus acknowledged that He had a kingdom, but not of this world, i.e., of this material realm (John 18:36). Earlier, He told His disciple, Peter, that He would give him the keys to His kingdom (Matthew 16:19). Peter did that on the Jewish feast day, Pentecost, 10 days after Jesus ascended into heaven (Acts 1:9-11; 2:38-47). He told the people to repent and be baptized for the remission of their sins.

Continue reading→

By Jim Mettenbrink

Shortly before being crucified, Judea’s Roman governor Pontius Pilate asked Jesus, “Are You the King of the Jews?” Jesus: “It is as you say” (Luke 23:1-3). Jesus had no army, administration, no territory, no palace – nothing “kingly” at all. He had nothing of this world (Luke 9:58).

In the same trial, Jesus told Pilate, “My kingdom is not of this world. If My kingdom were of this world, My servants would fight, so that I should not be delivered to the Jews; but now My kingdom is not from here” (John 18:36). And six weeks later Jesus disappeared (Acts 1:9-11). No doubt His kingdom is not of this world! In Pilate’s eyes, Jesus just said He is the King of a nonexistent kingdom. Such might seem insane but…It is certainly radical!

Continue reading→

By Jim Mettenbrink

The Kingdom of Heaven (32 times) is a major focus found only in the gospel according to Matthew. John the baptizer and Jesus said it would come into existence soon (Mat 3:2; 4:17; 10:7). Jesus emphasized this Kingdom in His well known Sermon on the Mount (8 times; Mat 5-7) and also mentioned in the beatitudes (Mat 5:3, 10). He referred to it as a mystery (Mat 13:11). In chapter 13, He presented six “Kingdom of Heaven parables (known as the kingdom parables) revealing unusual characteristics of this kingdom. In the declaration to His disciples, Jesus revealed that the kingdom was His, that it would come during their generation, and that it was synonymous with His church (Mat 16:16-19). He also told Peter that He would give him the keys to His kingdom. In other words, Peter would open the kingdom of heaven to everyone. When did that happen? When was Jesus’ church-kingdom opened to mankind?

Continue reading→

By Jim Mettenbrink

In our review of the erosion, yea the destruction, of the biblical foundation of our nation, we acknowledge that our society has become unstable, beginning with the family structure. King David, the Psalmist queried, “If the foundations are destroyed, what can the righteous do?” (Ps 11:3). The quick answer is rebuild the foundation as it was. And implicitly, the righteous folks have the heart to rise to do it. David continued, “The Lord is in His holy temple, the Lord’s throne is in heaven” (11:4). Another Psalmist revealed more about God’s throne – “Righteousness and justice are the foundation of Your throne” (Ps 89:114). In order to be in harmony with God and thereby have His blessing, it is logical, we too would want to mold ourselves to His standard of righteousness and justice. That begins with each of us. Our history reveals that cultural stability of the nation resulted from being in conformance to God’s order.

Continue reading→

By Jim Mettenbrink

We have reviewed the radical change over the past 100 years, especially the last 50, degrading from a God-fearing nation to one whose religion is Secular Humanism, that declares each person as his own god, making and changing his own rules as he desires. That such exists marks the decline of the nation and eventually consigned to the dust bin of history. Sadly most folks today do not realize that what they surmise is normal, is the work of Satan. The question is “Will people become tired of drowning in such spiritual misery and return to God and His way ONLY?”

Continue reading→

By Jim Mettenbrink

Last week we scratched the hem of the impact of the religion of Secular Humanism on Christendom, that surfaced nearly 50 years ago. Over 30% of the adults admit they are atheist, agnostic or simply do not care about the standard of ethics and morality in the Bible. Far more are those who say they believe in God but in reality disregard His standard. In other words, they are functional atheists, being true to their Humanist hearts – they do whatever and whenever they desire. Even God’s standard of a stable society has been scuttled. Lifelong, heterosexual monogamous marriage, the corner stone of society as God defines it, is now treated as bilge.

Continue reading→

By Jim Mettenbrink

Last week, in our review of the religion of Secular Humanism in the USA, we concluded by asking, “What has been the impact on Christendom?”

That the opportune venue to indoctrinate an unwitting society with Humanism was the public school system. It began with John Dewey’s program in the 1930s at Columbia University to condition teachers.

By the 1970s, the impact was evident even in theological schools. At about the same time (1975) when the Lavista NE High School implemented a mandatory Values Clarification course for seniors, the impact of Theological Modernism rose in the Concordia Lutheran seminary ( LCMS), the most conservative of Lutheran churches. The seed of Seminex was sown in a 1973 conference that charged professors of denying “sola scriptura,” i.e., doctrine must come from only scripture (Bible). Some of the admitted doctrines were that Jesus was not necessarily born of a virgin. Adultery is not necessarily wrong. What was the origin of the professors’ foundation that they could deny the absoluteness of the Bible? And the students who accepted the changes were already primed to make up their own minds. Implicitly, the rejection of the Bible as absolute and rejected the Sovereignty of God and thereby the inspiration of the scriptures. Seminex as an independent movement lasted until 1987 but it merged with a few other synods to form the ELCA.

Continue reading→

By Jim Mettenbrink

This series was prompted by Israel’s King David’s divinely recorded question, “If the foundations are destroyed, What can the righteous do?” (Psalm 11:3), and recognizing how our nation has declined from a God-fearing nation to one drowning in depravity. For over 100 years Secular Humanism has progressively become the American de facto religion.

Continue reading→